|For the schizophrenic in all of us|
I say all this because by the time 2E rolled around I'd been deeply entrenched in the 9-point alignment system. Some people even then considered the whole concept a dinosaur leftover from D&D's wargaming roots. Me, I just took it as it came, finally realizing that alignment was, with the exception of clerics and paladins, NOT a hard and fast set of rules, but more like guidelines for the player in figuring out the character's personality.
Now that I'm dealing with Basic though, I've come to appreciate the 3-point alignment. Lawful, Neutral and Chaotic, that's it. As much as I like a story that's told in black and white terms, I enjoy the wiggle room that the three point system gives me. Seems more believable that someone can be Lawful and still be evil or Chaotic and still be a good person. Even Neutral gets in the act. I look back and see that the AD&D alignment is way to specific for me. The 3-point system makes the PC think more about their character's motivations (plus it gives those clerics and paladins something more to worry about seeing as the morals are more vague) and gives the DM more variety in the types of NPCs and adventures he can use. You can still have characters that are obviously pure and good or black-hearted and evil too. When I get back to 2E I may import this.